|
|
|
|
Looks like there's another controversy brewing (thank goodness, because writers need things to write about), and this time, it involves differing opinions over whether or not breast pumps for nursing mothers should be tax deductible.
I wonder if this means we'll see H&R Block commercials showing breastfeeding women soon. Or if "Lady Liberty" in all of her foam costume glory hawking for Liberty Tax Service (someone, please explain the red costume) will be publicly nursing her baby on the corner of Brownsville Road and Arlington Avenue.
From Katie Park at the Post-Gazette:
A recent decision by the Internal Revenue Service to recognize breast pumps and breast-feeding supplies as tax-deductible medical expenses has led some to question if breast-feeding has become part of a political agenda.
After Michelle Obama announced just before the IRS ruling that she would support breast-feeding as part of her campaign against child obesity, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., pegged the first lady's position as "hard left" and suggested she was creating a "nanny state."
Sarah Palin made a similar jab at Ms. Obama in a speech Thursday, media outlets reported.
Aside from the fact that Sarah Palin has become the eternal butt of the "that's what she said!" joke, there is so much evidence that breastfeeding is the healthiest choice for your child, with hard science to back that up, I'm not sure why we're still debating this. What the right is uncomfortable with -- more than anything else, I'm wagering -- is this:

Ms. Miller, 29, said that although she is not opposed to breast-feeding, she chose not to breast-feed her children because she was nervous about becoming a mother. Government support of breast-feeding creates pressure on mothers, she said.
"There is a ton of pressure to breast-feed," she said. "I don't think it's fair or right to pressure moms to breast-feed, and they deserve to make the choice that's best for them and their families."
Classifying breast-feeding equipment as a medical expense is a slippery slope, Ms. Miller said.
Who the he$$ isn't nervous about becoming a mother? I'm still nervous, and my oldest is turning 18 in less than two months. But I'm not sitting around biting my nails ruminating about all the "pressure" from society. That's where we mothers go so wrong.
Ah yes, the potential things breasts can do are a great source of anxiety for all.
(Maybe she should get her nipples up over this: stripper's breast implants are ruled tax deductible.)
If you feel pressured to breastfeed, that is really, really YOUR problem. A breast pump isn't a luxury for women who choose to breastfeed. I'd hardly call a contraption that looks midieval and causes discomfort -- and sucks up all a lot of time (pun intended) -- a luxury item. It's a necessity, and should be tax deductible, and women should be rewarded for giving consideration to all of the future health problems she's averting by breastfeeding. Like obesity -- and making her child a part of the first generation of Americans with a shorter life expectancy exactly because of obesity-related mortality.
I think if you work it right, almost anything can be a tax deduction. Like blogging, for example.
Meantime -- aren't there bigger things than breasts we can worry about?

| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
+ +
In breastfeeding news:
Try to take a breast pump past security at the airport. The parts and heft of them are sure to freak out the guys at the gate. They'll ask, What is this??? Then they blush and let a loaded weapon past, seemingly. What's worse is the return flight when there are bottles of breast milk along with the pump. Humm, what's that restriction in volume size in ounces these days?