| Have a question for me on sports? This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ... I'll answer as many as I can in future blog posts. |
Sports blogsSteelers: Blog 'n' Gold
Penguins: Empty Netters
Pirates: PBC Blog
College Sports: Redshirt Diaries
High School: Varsity Blog
Fantasy Sports: The Fantasy Factor
Sports onlineussportspages.combaseball-reference.com pro-football-reference.com |
Below is a copy of a letter sent from NFL commissioner Roger Goodell to fans on the league’s data base.
I don’t quite get this letter, particularly at this time. With all the excitement generated by the end-of-season battle for playoff spots and with the playoffs set to start Saturday, it seemed an odd time to put the labor issue in front of the fans.
The letter makes quite clear that the 18-game schedule is at the top of Goodell's list of `must-haves' for the new collective bargainin agreement. -- Bob Smizik
Statement from Roger Goodell:
With one of the most exciting regular seasons now completed and the playoffs about to begin, let me first thank you and all NFL fans for your incredible support. Many fans have been asking me where we stand on signing a new collective bargaining agreement with the player's union. Let me update you and be clear at the outset:
I know we can and will reach an agreement.
My goal as Commissioner now is to help our teams and players find a solution that is fair to everyone and ensures that football becomes more popular, accessible, and fun. We want the next decade to be the best yet for our fans, and I'm ready to work day and night to make that happen.
We've come a long way. Compare where we are today with 10 years ago. From player accountability to player safety, more and better television coverage, upgrading the in-stadium experience, innovations like the RedZone channel, the Draft in prime time and playing the Pro Bowl before the Super Bowl, we are focused on doing what's best for the players, teams, and fans. My priority is and always will be the game and the fans who love our game.
The NFL is great because fans care deeply about it. Economic conditions, however, have changed dramatically inside and outside the NFL since 2006 when we negotiated the last CBA. A 10 percent unemployment rate hurts us all. Fans have limited budgets and rightly want the most for their money. I get it.
Yes, NFL players deserve to be paid well. Unfortunately, economic realities are forcing everyone to make tough choices and the NFL is no different. These are not easy negotiations, but the outcome can be positive. If both sides give a little, everyone, including fans, will get a lot and the game will improve through innovation.
Even in difficult economic times, a new CBA presents us with the opportunity to secure the future of our game. You may ask how will the NFL look under this vision?
A significant change would be to resolve fan complaints about preseason by modifying our 20-game format. Fans tell us they don't like the quality of the preseason games, and we're listening. An enhanced season of 18 regular season and two preseason games would not add a single game for the players collectively, but would give fans more meaningful, high-quality football.
Our emphasis on player health and safety is absolutely essential to the future of our game. We are strictly enforcing rules that protect players from unnecessarily dangerous play, especially involving hits to the head. We are changing the "play through it" culture to a "player-first" culture to ensure that if a player has a head injury, he doesn't play again until his health is certain. We are also addressing the potential wear-and-tear on players in the way they train in-season and off-season
It's not just the health of players that concerns us. We must ensure the health of the league. That includes a new system that properly compensates proven veterans and retired players by shifting some of the outrageous sums paid to many unproven rookies. Earlier this year, Sports Illustrated published a list of the 50 highest-paid American athletes that included five 2009 NFL rookies. Every other athlete on the list was a proven veteran. In 2009, NFL clubs contracted $1.2 billion to 256 drafted rookies with $585 million guaranteed before they had stepped on an NFL field.
Don't get me wrong: top draft choices will continue to be highly paid. All we're asking for is a return to common sense in paying our rookies. Other leagues have done this and we can too.
These improvements and more will lead to better football, plain and simple. A forward looking CBA that is fair to players and clubs will lead to a great future for the NFL and our fans.
My job is to represent the game - the fans, teams, players, coaches and business partners. Protecting the integrity of the game and ensuring it thrives is a responsibility I take very seriously.
This is about more than a labor agreement. It's about the future of the NFL. We have to improve and will be relentless in our quest. The commitment to our fans is to make the NFL experience even better in the years ahead. With a responsible CBA, we will fulfill that vision.
Happy New Year and enjoy the playoffs.
- Roger Goodell

)
A significant change would be to resolve fan complaints about preseason by modifying our 20-game format. Fans tell us they don't like the quality of the preseason games, and we're listening. An enhanced season of 18 regular season and two preseason games would not add a single game for the players collectively, but would give fans more meaningful, high-quality football.
written by JCP6
Both owners and players are greedy and it will be the fans that pay for such greed.
that will give Rodger the Dodger and the greedy owners (not all of them) even more money!
Seattle and Buffalo must get new uniforms. Adding 2 more games will result in a total of 64 more games a year (32 teams x 2 games). Why not just add four more teams? That would result in a additional 64 games even keeping the current 16 game schedule. LA is already waiting. Surely they can find 3 other cities/owners that will pay the NFL big bucks for a team.
every read ee cummings
These franchisees hire highly paid slaves to work and no matter how the conditions are they must work.
written by Bill, January 03, 2011 - 02:19 PM
@ JCP62
The definition of slave has no meaning relating to renumeration. Certain Bond Slaves were in fact paid to reduce a debt or obtain a free title to themselves or their chattel. If I play in the NFL and am garnered with a Franchise Player I cannot freely move to another team or freely sell my services to the highest bidder. I am not utilizing the term slave as a racial connotation. The plays are treated like chattel. MLB players won their freedom in the 70's the NFL still treats their players a slaves.
Goodell is running a 50 billion dollar corp with 32 franchisees
The definition of slave has no meaning relating to renumeration.
We're just slaves doing what the master tells us to do.
My solution? I bought the guys a beer, because I felt sorry for their lot in life.
If that did happen as you say it did, it is most likely the players were "venting" and in their eyes they may seem to be slaves without understanding that they most certainly are not, even if they think themselves to be... after all, they can just quit.
Clive -- normally I agree with you. If you are just providing the players perspective; fine. Please tell me you don't agree with it.
Both the owners and players need a dose of reality now and then to see what the real world is like.
Clive - I do hope you realize that I did not use slavery to depict the relationship between management and player. That was another poster.
Thanks for your feedback, but I don't think you answered my question. If you did, and I am missing it, I apologize.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
A couple of thoughts:
By what measure? There weren't any chases of long-held individual records. Yesterday's conclusion to the season included very few games with playoff implications. A 7-9 team made the playoffs. While I love the NFL, this wasn't a season to remember.
As far as the salary structure goes, I have heard that the players want a system that doesn't reward rookies so much, either. But I have a question: how do you do that without just reducing salaries, overall?
We're seeing in baseball a disinterest in veterans as more and more teams look for low-cost young players. If you reduce the cost of rookies, won't NFL teams rely on young players even more than they already do?
I point this out only as another example of the disingenuity of Roger Goodell. He has no interest in helping veteran football players, he only wants to drive down payrolls.
This guy ... is not a good guy...