| Have a question for me on sports? This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ... I'll answer as many as I can in future blog posts. |
Sports blogsSteelers: Blog 'n' Gold
Penguins: Empty Netters
Pirates: PBC Blog
College Sports: Redshirt Diaries
High School: Varsity Blog
Fantasy Sports: The Fantasy Factor
Sports onlineussportspages.combaseball-reference.com pro-football-reference.com |
We learned some interesting facts of Pirates life this week.
The good news is Keith Law ranks the Pirates as having the eighth best minor-league system. Whoopee!
The bad news is the stench of the Pirates has so infiltrated MLB that the team can’t give its money away. Pitchers Edwin Jackson and Roy Oswalt, both of whom would be the ace of the team's rotation, rejected offers from the Pirates for significant money.
Jackson wanted a team that would enhance his resume for a return to free agency next season. Oswalt wanted a contender. Clearly, the Pirates fit neither purpose.
Earlier in the off-season, first baseman Derrek Lee rejected the Pirates offer of arbitration, which, if accepted, would have guaranteed him a one-year contract worth about $8 million.
There you have it, folks. No one with any leverage in the market place wants the Pirates money. And Lee, apparently, would rather retire than play for the Pirates for $8 million.
Is there a greater condemnation of an organization than that? And coming, no less, from a player who spent two months with the team last season.
It seems that ``Welcome to hell,’’ is not a secret around the clubhouses of MLB.
Nineteen consecutive years of losing will do that for an organization. So will a reputation of having next to no interest in putting a winning team on the field. The Pirates commitment to winning is an absolute joke and it’s not a secret.
Despite the near-hopelessness of the situation, some fans believe the team can win by continuing on its course of building a farm system. That’s why the No. 8 ranking by Law, a leading authority on amateur and minor-league baseball, has generated some excitement. Law generated more excitement later in the week when he named five Pirates among his top 100 prospects. He also named his top 10 Pirates prospects.
All of this is commendable but not cause for great excitement. Early on in this nearly two-decade long losing spree, the Pirates had the No. 1 ranked farm system. And we can see where that got them.
It would be more encouraging for the future of the Pirates if these rankings were the result of some sort of baseball acumen. They are not. Pirates management deserves litte credit for these rankings. Unless, that is, you want to credit them for putting such bad teams on the field they consistently get high draft picks.
There is a tremendous premium on high draft selections in compiling these ratings. Gerrit Cole, the highest-ranked Pirate, was the first overall choice in the 2011 draft. Jameson Taillon, the second highest ranked, was the second overall pick in the 2010 draft.
The third-highest ranked Pirate was Josh Bell and there are people who fall all over themselves congratulating GM Neal Huntington and his staff for this pick.
The man who deserves the credit for Bell is not Huntington, not co-GM Frank Coonelly and not any of their lieutenants. It's owner Bob Nutting. When Bell was still available in the second round, it was an easy choice -- if you are willing to pay him $5 million, which Nutting authorized.
The draft is a rare example of the Pirates spending money. But since their combined draft spending and payroll puts their total expenditures at or near the bottom of all MLB teams, what’s the big deal?
Here’s hoping Cole, approximate arrival date 2013, Taillon (2015) and Bell (2016) go on to be great players. But that does not alter the cold, hard, repetitive fact that the Pirates are terrible and there is no end in sight of that.

regardless of the 19 straight losing seasons, THAT'S commitment
...if previous management had been doing the same thing maybe we wouldn't be on our way to another losing season.
If Derek Lee turns down 8 million dollars to play first base for the Pirates he is crazy. That is a lot of green.
Unless I am mistaken, the "significant" offers to Jackson and Oswalt were less than the teams who they signed with offered, so while "significant" in dollars they were a) below market b) way below what a hell-like organization needs to spend to attract a quality FA
written by Suwanee88, February 10, 2012 - 07:21 AM
Bob - I hope you will share with me about this question I am about to ask....You have been consistent about challenging the Pirates activity over the past few years and rightfully so, its been more negative than positive - Question -Do any of the Pirates executive contact you trying to defend themselves?
Not recently. -- Bob Smizik
Jackson accepted a one-year, $10 million contract Thursday from the Washington Nationals. The Pirates had offered the right-hander one- and three-year deals for slightly less money per year.
MAN
The organization sucks. The GM sucks. But what can they do really besides draft the best players available and hope those guys turn it around?
Things must be looking up for the Bucs when the Nattering Nutting Naysayers need to invent so many false reasons to whine, squeal, attack, moan, and complain.
That team will be a legit title contender
Cole will be up here in 2013. Really?
....the cold, hard, repetitive fact, that the Pirates are terrible and there is no end in sight of that.
Meathead I don't agree on picking up those options but I do agree with the other players you named.
That would be in the National league
I would suggest bringing in a front-office team that actually knows what it is doing. -- Bob Smizik
Here’s hoping Cole, approximate arrival date 2013, Taillon (2015) and Bell (2016) go on to be great players.
the cold, hard, repetitive fact that the Pirates are terrible and there is no end in sight of that.
I would suggest bringing in a front-office team that actually knows what it is doing. -- Bob Smizik
I would suggest bringing in a front-office team that actually knows what it is doing. -- Bob Smizik
To say Cole won't be up until 2014 at the earliest is completely w/o merit.
As fans we have two choices. We can continue to line the pockets of the Nuttings’ with money by attending games because we love the view PNC Park offers or we want to watch a guy like Neil Walker or Andrew McCutchen or witness an actual big league team when the visitors take the field. Or we can say enough is enough. Quit going to the games. Quit buying their products. Quit supporting the advertisers who support the team. Take a stance and hurt the Nutting’ pocketbook.
However, being realistic, we all know the latter scenario is never going to happen....So we fans are stuck. Stuck in some perverse baseball purgatory,
written by jasonpkerr, February 10, 2012 - 10:18 AM
Cole is the first big time college pitcher they have drafted other than Kris Benson. There is no evidence either way supporting how long it may take him to get to the majors.
written by roger roger, February 10, 2012 - 09:41 AM
My comments about 2014 or 2015 about Cole are not ridiculous.
This organization goes slow with promoting prospects.
I simply cannot see them fast-tracking Cole.
2014 is more likely, 2015 if he struggles.
Oh, and by the way, this is the plan that has been followed without fail by Huntington and Stark.
No cycnicsm involved. Just facts based on how they have handled others.
written by McPitt, February 10, 2012 - 09:34 AM
Please excuse my lack of apparent knowledge on the following... When drafting high end talent like Gerrit Cole, why does it take 4 - 5 years for him to reach the majors?
What's hilarious is you dismissing that w/o any sound reason. Your pitch count talk is also hilarious.
I personally don't care if the Pirates pick up ALL of AJ's salary, it's not my money - Sirius
How do you explain Pedro Alvarez? What are his facts?
They can then say that Cutch et al will be gone by then so there will never be enough good players in Pitt.
Food for thought: The Nat's paid ridiculous money to bring in Jayson Werth. Now they are attracting other free agents. Coincidence?

Sirius,
Tell me the last college pitcher the Pirates drafted with Cole's ability? The closest one is Benson. Even Paul Maholm was drafted in 03 and made debut in 05. Just stating facts here.
written by Sirius, February 10, 2012 - 10:14 AM
To say Cole won't be up until 2014 at the earliest is completely w/o merit.
I beg to differ, it IS with a ton of merit if you look at past Pirates pitching prospects. Cole hasn't had his prerequisite Tommy Johns or other arm or shoulder surgery yet. It seems like the Pirates pitching prospects all seem to lose a year or 2 recovering from some kind of surgery.
Thanks for the high regard, but being somebody's employee has never been a good fit for my bipolar temperament. I prefer to write books and present my own workshops on mental health.
written by Pecos Bill, February 10, 2012 - 11:17 AM
Someone mentioned Harden who is out for the season with a shoulder injury.
written by Richard Jarzynka www.BIPOLARMAN.org, February 10, 2012 - 11:37 AM
Cole, Taillon, Cain, Dodsen, Kingham, Von Rosenberg, and McPherson - all drafted by Huntington - have not had any arm problems.
written by Rich W, February 10, 2012 - 11:42 AM
Harden is a pretty good gamble for the Bucs.
All of the above-named pitchers were drafted by Bonifay or Littlefield under the ownership of McClatchy. Current management had nothing to do with them.
I posted my real name and my website as my screen name because I wanted to reveal my true identity in response to being chastised for oosting anonymously.
written by JosePagan, February 10, 2012 - 11:34 AM
...
Bipolar: You stated the following in the midst of a post decrying the so-called presumptions that others have made:
"Edwin Jackson decided that the Nationals are more ready to contend than the Pirates, and Roy Oswalt believes the same about the Rangers, Reds, and Sox."
Please provide the source for these definitive comments. A link will be fine.
Jackson wanted a team that would enhance his resume for a return to free agency next season. Oswalt wanted a contender. Clearly, the Pirates fit neither purpose.
written by sean t, February 10, 2012 - 08:30 AM
Richard Jarzynka,
Economics 101: A commodity is worth whatever a buyer is willing to pay for it. The Nationals paid more for Edwin Jackson than the Pirates offered him. Therefore, the offer the Pirates made to him was LESS than what he was worth, at least on a per year basis, which is the relevant basis since Jackson was not seeking a multi-year contract. Had they offered 1 year/$15 million, I'll bet he'd be a Pirate right now.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|